Thx, i figured it out. I checked still did this that’s why i don’t understand the empty link, but thx to Stupid, he fixed it.
Next patch i will separate all to not be confusing.
Thx, i figured it out. I checked still did this that’s why i don’t understand the empty link, but thx to Stupid, he fixed it.
Next patch i will separate all to not be confusing.
* <font color='YellowGreen'>[S&B] [1.1.3.0] (g3) (c+) (sr+) [Markovian family (Battlemage, Commando, Death Knight, Tactician, Witchblade)](http://) (Nandi) </font>
The (https://) part. Because of that if you click on the link it won’t go anywhere.
I couldn’t change the name on the old forum
You could have had. The formatting was:
[url=https:// ... link here ]Name[/url]
Still, I’d rather people not abuse that and name their builds in compendium submissions close to their thread names. Yours is just a special case.
Still, I’d rather people not abuse that and name their builds in compendium submissions close to their thread names. Yours is just a special case.
We can also change the name of our threads these days. So if the thread where the build is has a “weird” name - the author can change it now - no need of getting help from moderators with that
Stupid_Dragon:Still, I’d rather people not abuse that and name their builds in compendium submissions close to their thread names. Yours is just a special case.
We can also change the name of our threads these days. So if the thread where the build is has a “weird” name - the author can change it now - no need of getting help from moderators with that
There’s even a trick that allows to semi-automatically update patch versions in the compedium, but it’ll require a strict policy on how to name build threads. There’s also a tradition to add new builds to the top, effectively sorting them manually by patch version.
@Stupid_Dragon @malawiglenn Thx!
I separated them and checked all the links find the wrongs.
I will updated like that for the next patch.
Alright, got another Submission:
[S&B Melee] [1.1.3.0] (g3) (c+) (sr+) Drunken Fwuffy - Retaliation Warlord (Maya)
Tavabunga, @Stupid_Dragon
Plz add new Dervish
[Caster] [1.1.3.0] (g3) (sr+) (vid) Demonslayer (SR+) (No Greens) (omnitrio)
* <font color='YellowGreen'>[Caster] [1.1.3.0] (g3) (sr+) (vid) [Demonslayer (SR+) (No Greens)](https://forums.crateentertainment.com/t/caster-dervish-demonslayer-sr-no-greens/83728) (omnitrio)</font>
* <font color='YellowGreen'>Damage:</font> Vitality, Vitality Decay
* <font color='YellowGreen'>Active Skills:</font> Phantasmal Blades, Ring of Steel, Blade Spirit, Pneumatic Burst, Vire’s Might, Judgment, Summon Guardian of Empyrion, Ascension
* <font color='YellowGreen'>Passive Skills:</font> Path of the Three, Presence of Virtue, Resilience
* <font color='YellowGreen'>WPS Skills:</font> none
Also Plz update solo class OK
* <font color='YellowGreen'>[Caster] [1.1.2.5] (g3) (sr+) (vid) [Solo Class Virtue (SR+) (No Greens)](https://forums.crateentertainment.com/t/caster-solo-class-oathkeeper-virtue-sr-no-greens/50408) (omnitrio)</font>
* <font color='YellowGreen'>Damage:</font> Fire, Burn
* <font color='YellowGreen'>Active Skills:</font> Aegis of Menhir, Vire’s Might, Judgment, Summon Guardian of Empyrion, Ascension
* <font color='YellowGreen'>Passive Skills:</font> Divine Mandate, Presence of Virtue, Resilience
* <font color='YellowGreen'>WPS Skills:</font> none
and
* <font color='YellowGreen'>[Caster] [1.1.2.5] (g3) (sr+) (vid) [Solo Class Octavius (SR+) (No Greens)](https://forums.crateentertainment.com/t/caster-solo-class-oathkeeper-octavius-sr-no-greens/50527) (omnitrio)</font>
* <font color='YellowGreen'>Damage:</font> Physical, Internal Trauma
* <font color='YellowGreen'>Active Skills:</font> Aegis of Menhir, Vire’s Might, Judgment, Summon Guardian of Empyrion, Ascension
* <font color='YellowGreen'>Passive Skills:</font> Divine Mandate, Presence of Virtue, Resilience
* <font color='YellowGreen'>WPS Skills:</font> none
[Hybrid] [1.1.3.0] (g3) (sr+) (vid) [Bottlemage - IT’S ALIVE [SR+] [1.1.3.0.] Bottlemage - IT'S ALIVE [c+] [sr+] & a small feedback about 1h BA (afanasenkov26)
Hey Dragon, did I get it right? Haven’t been reading the compendium thread lately.
Hey Dragon, did I get it right? Haven’t been reading the compendium thread lately.
Almost. The damage, active skills, passive skills and wps skills have to be a sublist, for that you need to double tap a space before the asterix. Also there has to be a space between the build name/link and author’s name.
I fixed it myself, so no worries.
I’d still fix my post just to have a template for future builds
* <font color='YellowGreen'>[S&B] [1.1.3.0] (g3) (c+) (sr+) [The Tornado - Pierce EoR Dervish](https://forums.crateentertainment.com/t/1-1-3-0-the-tornado-pierce-eor-dervish-6-20-cruci/83684) (x1x1x1x2) </font>
* <font color='YellowGreen'>Damage: </font> Pierce
* <font color='YellowGreen'>Active Skills: </font> Eye of Reckoning, Ring of Steel, Shadow Strike, Pneumatic Burst, Ascension, Displacement
* <font color='YellowGreen'>Passive Skills: </font> Divine Mandate, Veil of Shadow, Presence of Virtue, 2x Whirling blades
* <font color='YellowGreen'>WPS Skills: </font> Nope
Enjoy!
Btw my submission had s&b in it and it’s dw melee
Alright, got another submission:
[Pet] [1.1.3.0] (g3) (c)
(sr+) Crazy Fwuffy - Pet Purifier (Maya)
I respectfully disagree. I have no evidence that it is misleading for new players, while you insist on that as if it is a well-known fact or something easily deduced.
Not sure if its evidence, but it is at least one “case”
So just bought this game on the steam summer sale and since … (SNIP) …
I figured this build looks enjoyable to play and [no greens] tag makes me believe it’s quite beginner friendly,
Not sure if its evidence, but it is at least one “case”
“[no greens] tag makes me believe it’s quite beginner friendly”
I don’t know glenn, perhaps the problem here is the guy thinks a build full-slotted with legendaries is beginner-friendly simply by the virtue of having no greens in it? This got nothing to do with allowing budget MIs into g3, because g3 is NOT a beginner build cathegory to begin with. Because otherwise we’ll be calling builds like that beginner-friendly.
Hello!Could you delete my 2 sorcerer’s posts and add this?
[Caster] [1.1.3.0] (g4) (c+) (sr) (vid) Hellfire Sorcerer, CR 6:06, Fun Build Experience (Shoot2033)
[Caster] [1.1.3.0] (g3) (c+) (sr) (vid) Pyran Hellfire Sorcerer, CR 5:29, Fun Build Experience (Shoot2033)
[Caster] [1.1.3.0] (g3) (c+) (sr+) (vid) Cataclysm+Justicar Sorcerer, CR 6:01, Resilent (Shoot2033)
[Caster] [1.1.3.0] (g3) (c+) (sr+) (vid) Ulzuin+Cyclone Sorcerer, CR 5:06, Resilent (Shoot2033)
I’ve done a major update to the first post of the compendium today. Check it out!
I’ve done a major update to the first post of the compendium today. Check it out!
Looks good at a first glance, sick job man!
I will read more in detail tomorrow.
I did find “©” here and there, did we come up with a solution for that?
[thread=19056]How Many Attribute Points: A Guide[/thread]: Want to report your distribution of stat points, but forgot?
under “Resources” seems to be something wrong there?
Any reason why playstyle tag [shield melee] and [shield ranged] is with small letters and not capital first letter in each word e.g. [Shield Melee]
I will look more into it later
Resources is the only section I didn’t update yet.
The solution for © is (c)
`(c)`
As for the tag I’ll fix it tomorrow.