Greens have to be allowed, since some builds are just based around MIs.
Yes, someone else may pilot it for you.
No pharma.
Greens have to be allowed, since some builds are just based around MIs.
Yes, someone else may pilot it for you.
No pharma.
Got it, should stop using aetherward oil then. Probably no cluster too, I guess.
Question: when we talk about SR tags, are there implied expectations of reliability, i.e. success rates? What if a build can’t manage a specific boss combination? (To be clear, I’m not asking for these builds but for future reference.)
Anyhow, here goes:
[Caster] [1.1.4.0] (g4) (c+) (sr) (vid) Trozan, Grounded – Lightning Skybreach Warlock (Pareto)
[Caster] [1.1.4.0] (g4) (c+) (sr) The Cloudburst – Lightning Skybreach Druid (Pareto)
10 charsss
[Hybrid] [1.1.4.0] (g4) [1.1.4.0] Reaper of Souls - Soulrend-based BH Reaper [c+] [sr] (afanasenkov26)
For what it’s worth, I’m not sure the Compendium is the appropriate place to hold a leaderboard at all. I’m worried that it may discourage entries if the entrant can’t compete with top clear times, or that others looking for a new build may ignore anything not on the leaderboards. I would rather the Compendium not become a competition; there are plenty of other threads for that.
On a separate note, I think it may be worth discussing new standards for SR clear standards considering that the new patch seems to have greatly increased the difficulty across all higher-level shards with the nemesis updates. I’m betting a lot of builds that used to clear 75 might not be able to do so any more, at least not as consistently. Thoughts?
I agree with it
Must be new thread with Leaderboards
Both Cruci | SR
Hello, Val. Here is my new bi-elemental Warlock
[Caster] [1.1.4.0] (g3) (c+) (SR+) (vid) Grim Dawn: Episode 1.1.4.0, warlock strikes back (Dmt)
Tavabunga, @Stupid_Dragon
Paladin Update
[Ranged] [1.1.4.0] (g3) (sr+) (vid) Janey Powell Gunslinger (No Greens) (omnitrio)
Thanks Dragon!
I’m in a rather sour mood right now (not caused by you), so forgive me for the lack of courtesy.
First of all, your builds were added, as promised. Few things I’d like to remind:
https://forums.crateentertainment.com/t/1-1-4-0-reaper-of-souls-soulrend-based-bh-reaper-c-sr/86283
[Build name](https://forums.crateentertainment.com/t/1-1-4-0-reaper-of-souls-soulrend-based-bh-reaper-c-sr/86283)
https://forums.crateentertainment.com/t/86283
Two points above is basically ignoring submission format, especially the second one. Right now I’m fixing it for you, but if my patience runs out I’ll just tell to fix it yourself next time.
On link shortening in general. I would appreciate if you shorten them yourself. It uses less symbols and doesn’t cause the click counter to glitch in some unexplainable cases, moreover doesn’t cause the click counter to reset if you changed your build thread’s name and asked me to update your submission to new patch.
I’m sorry for the delay, I had to think about it but didn’t come to any definitive conclusion at the time, so I’ll just share what’s on my mind.
That’s about it.
P.S. I removed your liberal additions in your submission. Look, while I don’t disagree with your vision in general, you can’t sneak stuff in like that.
Did you expect me to think about it while I sleep, or what?
I think there’s nothing principially wrong with holding a leaderboard in Compendium at all. In fact I’ve been thinking about a separate thread too, but then it dawned on me that Compendium is a pretty good place for that.
I don’t really think that leaderboard would be a barrier that would discourage people from submitting builds, if anything I feel like the biggest barrier is the hassle of filling the form. There’s a much bigger problem of people not posting mediocre-performing builds to begin with, and the existence of leaderboard would be just one drop into the sea (or last nail into the coffin, depends on your way of thinking, lol).
As for people only willing to play what tops the leaderboard - that’s an interesting statement considering that some people in Discord told me a completely different reason to not hold leaderboard in Compendium - “people look in Compendium to find a build they fancy, they won’t give a fuck about your leaderboard”.
But okay, as I said I wasn’t averted to idea of doing it in another thread, but let’s put it to vote at least.
0 voters
That’s a good point, but I don’t really want to go into “(sr+) is 75 for patches before 1.1.4.0 and 65 from 1.1.4.0 onward”, that would be pretty confusing.
EDIT: goddamn, this post took so much time
What do you mean? The devotion procs? The OP states:
I wasn’t trying to sneak anything in, I just assumed the line above meant one could optionally list the devotions, even if they weren’t included in the default template.
I see. My bad, it’s a leftover from my earlier attempt to change compendium submission template, which indeed had Devotion proc as an optional thing. Sorry for the confusion, will be fixed.
Challenge accepted
I’m working on a Clairvoyant Cabalist whose damage comes almost entirely from Doom Bolt / Reap Spirit. You want mediocre-at-best, I’ll give you mediocre-at-best
Reminds me of x1x1x2’s old build. It wasn’t all that great but it worked.
That will probably be better now, since doom bolt and reap spirit aspects of clairvoyant got buffed IIRC.
Regarding leaderboards, I voted for separate thread but that does pose the problem of stickies. Mods don’t want a lot of stickied threads and we can’t insert the leaderboards thread to the compendium list sticky cause it’s not the compendium. Or can we do that? I thunk separate thread will be better for organization tho. Much easier editing.
Also, I’d like to propose something with the leaderboard - we should have a different board for each class. Just for fun, it’ll be great to see which defiler is the best among all defilers
Funny, Omnitrio suggested the very same thing to me the other day. I’ll think about it.
plz add
[Caster] [1.1.4.0] (g4) (sr+) (vid) A man with a laser - AAR Clairvoyant Warlock (Safarel)
hallo,bro,could u plz tell me which is the most powerful and strongest BD, I wanna copy,thx!