Ring of royal grandeur

Grim Dawn Ideas and Feedback
1

There a lot of good sets in GD. But for some of them there is the problem, that for example you don’t like one part for it’s stats, but you don’t want to lose bonus that you have for full set.

In late game if you are not farming-all-your-life you sometimes have problem in geting last part of set that you need.

So, mb there is an opportunity to make something like “ring of royal grandeur” in D3 that allow you have set bonuses like you wear 1 more part of set than you have.

What do you think about that? That will allow people to make new interesting lategame builds.

2

I personally think putting sets in was a mistake to begin with, but the genie’s out of the bottle and it’s probably not going back in without a huge fight, so…

3

Ahahah, true, sets spoiled it quite enough already on their own

4

removing Set´s from this type of game would be bad i guess !!
it´s one of the core features in an ARPG´s

5

The first Diablo didn’t have sets.

6

That’s because it was the first Diablo. Lots of stuff came after it.

7

This is true.

That said, I don’t really think sets are as great a feature of ARPGs as some might think.