[Suggestion] Class Restricted Items

Grim Dawn Ideas and Feedback
1

I have an idea for diablo-like weapon restrictions for Grim Dawn Classes
Like

Soldier - Tower Shields (Higher Dfence + 1 Modifier)

Demolitionist - Flamethrower or Heavy 2h ranged weapon (Higher DPS + 1 modifier)

Occultist - Some Off - hand that give immortal summon instantly

Nightblade - Specific 1h (Higher DPS + 1 modifier), Chacram basically ranged weapon that uses close combat modifiers)

Arcanist - 1h or 2h maces with close ranged non physical damage

Shaman - Heavy 2h weapon (Higher DPS + 1 modifier)

Inquisitor - Gunblade (salute ff8)

Necromancer - 1h 2h aether/vitality skytche (higher range)

2

Why would you want to restrict build ideas? Devs have been adding more modifiers so more mastery combination choices.

2 handed weapons in one hand are not happening, it’s been said many times as has the fact that no staves/bows will be in the game. It’s not that sort of fantasy world.

3

By giving class some speciality )))
I think thre are no problem to add string in all DBR files classUSEby just for editing issues.

4

Masteries are specialities in themselves. Mixing gives you even more specialities. GD is not D2/3 where one class has everything already built in like Barbarian or Wizard.

5

Awful idea, all you do is restrict builds. As to specialty, that is done by the skilks already.

6

Going to add in as well that I’m pretty sure they have said that new weapons/anything that requires new animation sets is not a consideration for the upcoming expansion.

7

Restricting diversitiness is not a good idea but there is no speciality in masteries… that i agree on. Just being able to select mastery skills is neither specialty nor must not be considered as specialty. Stats are not very different either thus by selecting mastery we need some bonuses. Bonuses can come from either stat bar or some not selectable passive i dunno.

For example arcanist can have bonus energy regen, spell amp, warrior can have psy resistance bla bla.

8

Dear Menhir NO!
Flashback to early D&D around 80’s.:smiley:
U can use what U can lift is fine.
There is a bit o point in this, however.
Wouldn’t it be nice to NOT get stuff clearly meant for say melee builds rolled with caster/ranged affixes?
Then again this IS GD where EVERYTHING can be mixed into sort of functional build.

9

People already complain about sets restricting build diversity (which i disagree), doubt most people would want something like this.

10

No plz no. No Arbitrary restriction.

11

Diablo 2 Fury within:eek:

12

It’s always a struggle to balance between class identity and build diversity.
GD edged towards favoring diversity over identity, which is a perfectly valid choice.

However, it is possible to go for some class identity by simply adding mastery-specific skins, without giving up on diversity in the builds. I’d grind for some cool arcanist-only skins at lvl 100 to unlock at my transmogs.

13

I others have said, it’s a bad idea because your restricting build diversity.

14

Those masteries literally have passive skills that do that.

Anyways, terrible idea. Adds nothing to the game.

Enviado desde mi 6039A mediante Tapatalk

15

Yup maybe.

16

Regardless of skills, you need to be rewarded just because choosing that mastery. It should be included in mastery bar stat bar while leveling. Otherwise what is the point of labeling them as mastery; Just create a pool of all skills and tell player to build around it. Because mastery bar rewards are very similar between each.

17

You are rewarded. You get a whole new mastery and skills to play around with. :slight_smile:

18

My last sentence explains everything. “Pool part”

19

Not agree with restrictions. They dont bring anything good (even in real life) xdddd

20

Nope, not fun really. You just end up with a mish mash of skills with no clear idea of where your build’s going.