Zantai said it was deliberately penalized, likely exactly to prevent easy “cherrypicking” class affixes by this method ![]()
sneaky devs always a step ahead of us
(except if we’re actually after generic affix)
Zantai said it was deliberately penalized, likely exactly to prevent easy “cherrypicking” class affixes by this method ![]()
sneaky devs always a step ahead of us
(except if we’re actually after generic affix)