New hypotheses:
+Soldier: Slayer
+Demolitionist: Dragoon (The term did originally refer to grenadiers…)
+Occultist: Harbinger
+Nightblade: Frostcaller/Cryomancer (It’s not like the two components are particularly magic-heavy…Although if the choice had been mine, we’d see Necrurgist, Cryurgist, and Pyrurgist instead. >>; )
+Arcanist: Soothsayer
+Shaman: Evoker
+Inquisitor: Custodian
+Necromancer: Reaver
+Oathkeeper: Thane
I’d flip Arcanist and Shaman, there’s no way an Arcanist who views magic as a scientific discipline would be called a Soothsayer. The aggressive aspect of Berserker would fit very nicely with the traditional DnD Evocation school of magic for Evoker.
It has been spoiled that Oathkeeper + Berserker is Zealot.
I had the idea that the Evoker is evoking the power of nature. >>;
Anyway, we at least now know that Thane was not the one exactly correct guess. Could still be in there, probably as +Soldier, mind. We can use Warlord and Death Knight (conceit of ruling something, even if just a barony) as the closest things to precedent for the theme.
The one thing I’s say is that Thane I almost guarantee is one of the 3 on the list of being used. But I think that would make more sense with the Zerk + Shaman combo only because Thanes are typically represented by lightning powers. They’re generally not regarded or thought of as highly defensive but melee and spell offensively focused and lightning themed.
I’ll admit that I was mostly thinking thane in the original historical context of a minor noble…Except I thought it was a Norse title. Turns out it’s actually an Old English title. But that reasoning is also why, when the Oathkeeper dyad titles were teased, I felt Paladin and Templar were interchangeable, with one of them probably being +Soldier. Very similar conceits (high state officials well-trained in weapon usage in real life, clerical conceits in pop culture which the Oathkeeper component handles anyway).
TQ Stormcallers (that and Warrior got you Thane) were part-ice, anyway, and the Berserker component has that down pat.
One of these is correct!
Relic keep confirmed.
So, so far out of
Slayer
Harbinger
Descerator
Reaver
Soothsayer
Evoker
Thane
Gladiator
Hellion
Beastmaster
Wildling
Wraith
Redeemer
Relic Keep Duh
We know that 3, maybe 4 (assuming not the same name guessed twice) are correct and only 1 is spot on for the class combo.
So many tq combos…
And we still don’t have an assassin…
Assassin’s is Nightblade’s rare mastery prefix.
Well, given that nearly a third of the current class names in GD come from TQ I’m going to ask - are any of these correct Zantai?
Slayer
Harbinger
Soothsayer
Evoker
Thane
Perhaps. Who knows. You didn’t assign any of them to a class combo so…
Okay, Mr. Clever Clogs. We’ll do this the hard way.
Berserker +Soldier: Slayer
Correct or not?
My suspicion is that the correct one from the graphic is Berserker + Nightblade = Slayer.
I’m presuming that Zantai meant that exactly one set of dyad and name matches, not that only one of those names is in there at all.
Next guesswork:
+Soldier: Thane
+Demolitionist: Dragoon
+Occultist: Harbinger
+Nightblade: Slayer
+Arcanist: Frostcaller (remember that technically, you can get a Pyromancer to use entirely electricity damage, with fire sight unseen…)
+Shaman: Marauder
+Inquisitor: Runemaster (the relic/custodian situation was my thinking that runes would be treated as a kind of relic in-universe)
+Necromancer: Reaver
+Oathkeeper: Zealot (confirmed)
One of these is correct.
Okay
Berseker + Nightblade: Slayer
