I think master Zantai should before or in conjunction with fangs of asterkarn release a pack with new skins based on new female armor, it doesn’t need to be many, just a few to at least make the outfits balanced between the choices of female and male characters.
All the armor already has a male and female variant. If you own packs 2 and 3 you might want to check out the Great Wolf’s Chestguard and Mogdrogen’s Divine Armor.
*i do want a Loyalist 4 pack tho ofc
Souds like “Grim Dawn Loyalistress pack 1”
I do, but frankly speaking there are very few garments that match the female perssonage, in theory I do not clearly see an armor that defines many female traits.
I have Maiven sphere and inquisitor seal, I don’t need no armor.
No, it’s not about bikinis but armor that defines normal traits of a female personage, because it is obvious that we only see more armor that matches more with male than female characters, and before starting the game we have the option to choose, and the game is not only played by boys but by girls as well.
Yes, we do and I’m more than happy with proper armour rather than skimpy stuff like TQ has.
because that’s how armours that make sense actually work?
it’s some weird RPG trope that female armours should be distinctly different, or should i say "horny"trope
doesn’t really matter if you dont’ want full on bikinis, the point still stands
your character is probably more concerned with practicality and utility than showing off butt/cleavage or “female curves” in tight platings…
heck, i’m probably a hot blooded guy like the next one, and i echo Medea’s sentiment, it’s almost refreshing to not have chestage mails as the norm in Cairn/in a game
it’s like Game of Thrones, at a certain point “something” just gets so over-saturated it becomes boring, then almost nauseatingly annoying, to be served 24/7 wherever you go
It’s a game that is played in a Victorian era, right? Look for the women’s clothes that were used at that time and you will see what I mean.
did they use those clothes on the battlefield tho ?
i specifically used victorian instead of victoria’s secret
There were no women who fought hand to hand but there were witches, sorceresses, archers, it would be very ignorant to say that what works for one works for all.
They don’t, and their taste is not universive, lady moderator.
if you’re trying to argue to the rational sense, then you’re making even less sense
Victorian era used guns, similar reasons there are no bow in GD - and archers still didn’t dress to impress; but incase they took a paddling (you might be mixing up hobby archery/show archery with battlefield archery)
and witch or sorcerer regardless; they still “want” actual padding, for the non magical beating they’re going to take “on the battlefield”
again, it’s game, nothing technically has to make sense, hence why bikini armours even got to exist in the first place in other games
my point is more; does every rpg have to be turned into spankbank material?
cant’ we just enjoy a nice semi normal armour or non-boobage robe once in a while?
The armor in the game isn’t representative of Victorian male fashion, either.
If you’re satisfied with all the characters looking like men, that’s fine, and a taste of your own.
they don’t look like men tho
they look like someone going into a fight,
and like someone that dont’ want to immediately die
armour is strangely unisex that way, increase survival
Sure enough, yes, when you start the game and see both men and women wearing pants, the first impression that passes is that everything serves everyone instead of differentiating, if that’s the way then what sense does it make to have a choice for female perssonage? then puts only male and leaves out women.
Hypocrisy, looking like a man will not make a woman more or less strong than them, the same jobs that a man does today many women do even better than them without losing their feminine form.