By reading that,I actually smile,cause realized how many smart people the game attracts.The best way to play the game as newbie,according to me,is to start what you enjoy and then if you want to get better or reach end game,to follow guide or simply to ask:)
Saboteur is one of my favorite classes,couple weeks ago I posted Cold dw melee.But is not that good class and Nightbalde is not lightning class.That’s why you get the reactions is not gonna work end game.I am babbling again,so please ignore my comment:D
There are other problems with QFT: like we can not describe Gravity AT ALL with QFT so the fact that you miss the value of cosmological constant by +100 orders of magnitude is just icing on the cake.
So we have to wait for the String Theory ladies and gentlemen to work it out, and accept that QFT is very good for somethings, but very bad at other things. QED is still the best understood physical phenomenon (QFT of abelian U(1) gauge symmetry) both in terms of experiment and theory
I have once figured the exact amount of change I needed while I was standing in the line to KFC waiting to order my hot wings bucket. People had no idea why I had such a smug look. To this day I am still proud of that moment.
I knew some of my fellow undergrad students got pretty upset when they learned about this, they had pretty high expectations that QFT is a theory of everything. What got me going was that nevertheless it can predict AND confirm experimentally, stuff to 10 decimal places correct on energy scales that are sub nuclear - pretty impressive stuff considering that we can only determine the best known force in everyday life - gravity - to five decimal places. Thus QED is 100 000 “better” than gravity one could say
Yeah QED is definitely one of the more useful subfields. I work more on the astroparticle/cosmology side of things. Currently my project is working with neutrino oscillations and working with the PMNS matrix. I do think it’s interesting that neutrinos leave with a certain flavor eigenstate and then oscillate with their mass eigenstates(which affect the probability amplitudes). My group is working on finding the actual mass of neutrinos and we’ve constructed a model that uses a right handed neutrino matrix as a free parameter to find the mass. Really at this point it’s more about refinement and making sure we can use the right handed neutrino matrix as something that is fixed.
The other project I’m working on is the Xenon Dark matter experiment(the one associated with WIMPS). I’m working on computational models to determine what conditions we need to detect dark matter. I don’t know too much about it right now, but I’m sure as next year passes I’ll get my hands more into it.
Quarks mix too you know (their weak eigenstates) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa_matrix It is “just” a mathematical artifact due to how the accidental symmetries in the SM works, you do not have enough free parameters to diagonalize the mass-matrix. I would find it more interesting if quarks and neutrinos did NOT mix since then it would exist another mechanism/symmetry that makes their mass-matrices diagonal, don’t you think so?
As a Higgs-oriented dude, I was more into understanding how neutrinos gets mass from EWSB. I did some work on the side with Higgs Triplet models but I never included that in my final thesis.
Didn’t reply to this last night when I read it and it had no replies cause I didn’t wanna spoil OP about how bad sabo is at lategame. Then this turned into a some theoretical physics shit. Can’t we just talk about normal physics here guys?
Yeah I would think so. I admit I can’t get too in depth at that specific point, but I’ll know more in time. I’m still 27 and got several more years in my physics journey, but hey like I said, it’s the journey I enjoy the most.
7:30 actually looks insane next to words “Pierce sabo”, lol. But I doubt anything can come close the spec I made and it’s partly due to sabo having no real gear options.
