How many times did ABC say the following: ‘this isn’t a high dmg build’ / ‘this isn’t a OP build’ / ‘this build tried something different’. He forewarned everyone.
Commenting/opinions are fine, but bashing the exact areas that the build creator forewarned is asinine.
Come on, dude. We are supposed to have fun with all builds we play, to enjoy the thrill to realize our ideas.
To make competition in the game? Don’t you have that fully in reallife?
I’m commenting on the https://www.bilibili.com/video/av23996142 vid. Not his witch hunter build, which i haven’t commented on at all. I only informed him that pb demonslayer vit witch hunters are stupidly strong this patch.
Sorry dude, but when you post a video of a build doing 150-170 and then make a statement afterwards saying it’s doing it with 3x nemesis/mini-boss monster spawns when it isn’t? Why are you then surprised that someone calls you out on it? There’s only 3x amount of trash monsters, i watched the vid, i didn’t see 9x nemesis monsters on wave 160 or 12x nemesis on wave 170 or 3 anasterias on wave 169. All the dangerous waves were mostly the same. Any build with decent aoe that can do the same. Hence not impressed.
Yup did. All I see is you saying “I’m not impressed” about 40 times. We got it the first time, and yet you keep repeating it…
I also wonder if you have ever talked or written to someone in another language. 1st step is not to take everything they say literally: lots of nuances are lost in translation.
I highly doubt a player with 4000+ hours would state that this WH build is more OP than a PB Vit WH.
That mistake is mine. Edit 2: uploaded the right video at post #46
Weird though. Supposed to be 3 times .
I’ll make another video.
But good quality of battlemage is not toppled by it.
thank you for pointing it out.
Edit 1: though if BM can facetank 4 nemesis easily, more of them wouldn’t be a threat in cruci , because most would be blocked by others, hence immediate damage won’t be as much as it adds up.