[GrimTools] Item Database

[jalex3]

An option the hide items from FG and or AoM would be useful I think.

[Dammitt]

Forgive the ineptitude, but I’m having a hard time filtering my item searches in Grim Tools.

For example: I want to look up all one-hand ranged with fire attributes.’

I click on one-hand ranged in the left column, then I type in “fire” the the search box above, but it returns all items, not just 1h ranged.

Where am I going wrong with this?

Thanks!

You’ll be able to do that very soon via advanced search. Currently the only way is either to use browser search in item db or you can open calc, select item slot and search there, it’s limited to selected slot+type.

• Checking if an item contains X or Y (for example, which items give me fire or elemental damage %, or conversion etc)
• Checking which items grant any bonus to X mastery, for example, searching which items give + to soldier or any skills that particular mastery has, instead of searching through hundreds of items which give a particular skill, to then search another particular skill and so on.
• If item contains something, search if it has a particular stat and then show all items that do that (I think this does no sense, but I mean something like, if an item has “bonus to all pets”, search, lightning damage and give me only those results which have lightning damage in bonus to all pets).
• Search for a stat only in MI’s
• Searching stats only in item procs (although, this might be considered useless by most people)
• Searching a particular stat in a skill modifier (all items that have e.g. % reduced energy cost in a skill modifier)
• Checking which items spawn a pet (by any means)
• Excluding set bonuses from search (this is something that I’d love to have)

That’s probably everything. If something already exists, then oops.

Thanks. Most of these, except for item skills will be coming in the initial version of adv. search.

probably it has been said already but:

simply put a flag on the left column (item categories) so it’s possible to search the parameter on the search engine only for the flagged categories

In adv. search you’ll be able to select categories.

An option the hide items from FG and or AoM would be useful I think.

Yeah, you’ll be able to do that in advanced search.

I also wanted to say that in future I’m planning to introduce a sort of “global filter” based partially on adv search. Basically there’s a global filter already, but it includes only one property - rarity. In future you’ll be able to include other “global” props in there.

[Dammitt]

Advanced search is now available. You can now find almost anything you need. Currently searching through granted skills/procs isn’t supported, but this will be added in future.

[smh]

thx for advanced search

[tean101]

i also get the message with the chrome browser today, all grim tools, all 6 page says in the chrome browser:

not safe and the https symbol in the bar is red

Edit:

Google Chrome ist auf dem neuesten Stand.
Version 74.0.3729.131 (Offizieller Build) (64-Bit)

[gregory_portman]

Advanced search is now available. You can now find almost anything you need. Currently searching through granted skills/procs isn’t supported, but this will be added in future.

Well, I think there are some problems with searching for certain +skills on preffixes and suffixes.

This is my example:
I am looking for all pref/suff with Demo skill: Stun Jacks

So, I have checked following check-boxes:
Item prefixes, Item suffixes, skill bonus to: Stun Jacks.
All the rest check-boxes are unchecked.

The search result is 500 random (?) affixes.

So I asume that smth might go wrong in the code? Try for yourself.

Or am I doing smth wrong?

Take Care,
GP.

ps. Oh, I might find the problem - I should put min/max also. When I put min=1 max=1… Everything comes into place.

SO FALSE ALERT…

[Dammitt]

Yeah, in current implementation you should always specify min or max or both, otherwise the field will be ignored. I probably should provide some hit for that.

[Akala]

Hello there !

It seems that there is a bug in the search engine for the Bysmiel’s Desert Barb augment (I don’t know if it happens for others).

When searching with “pierce resistance” or even “*% pierce resistance” (without quotes), the augment does not appear in the results, see https://i.imgur.com/afFttNH.png .

However, it is found if using “12% pierce resistance” or “Bysmiel’s Desert Barb”.

[Dammitt]

Hello there !

It seems that there is a bug in the search engine for the Bysmiel’s Desert Barb augment (I don’t know if it happens for others).

When searching with “pierce resistance” or even “*% pierce resistance” (without quotes), the augment does not appear in the results, see https://i.imgur.com/afFttNH.png .

However, it is found if using “12% pierce resistance” or “Bysmiel’s Desert Barb”.

Not really a bug per se. but rather unusual filter order + search result count limit. It just doesn’t get included in the resulting set, due to 500 item limitation. I’m not sure though, why exactly this particular item is excluded and others are shown instead.

You can check that it’s possible to actually find this specific item, e.g. via “pierce resistance” “augment”.

On a side note if you use advanced searchm you’ll find it without any issue.

[USER_NAME_01]

Don’t know if you know about it, “spirit” is not being searched: https://youtu.be/I3zeZkkwHII

Doesn’t find “spirit”, but inserting “spi” does find stuff:

[Dammitt]

Don’t know if you know about it, “spirit” is not being searched: https://youtu.be/I3zeZkkwHII

Doesn’t find “spirit”, but inserting “spi” does find stuff:

Working as intended. This field is called “name” for a reason, you can use it to filter items by names. If you want to search by spirit - there’s a field for that in character attributes section. If you want to search the old-fashioned way using pseudo full-text search, you can do that using old search field.

[USER_NAME_01]

Working as intended. This field is called “name” for a reason, you can use it to filter items by names. If you want to search by spirit - there’s a field for that in character attributes section. If you want to search the old-fashioned way using pseudo full-text search, you can do that using old search field.

Huh, didn’t think about it this way. Thanks for explaining.

[extranji]

Doing a normal search for “converted” leaves out several belts (maybe more, but the belts are what I noticed it for). Specifically:

Boneweave Girdle (Mythical version is displayed as expected)
Gladiator’s Distinction (Mythical version is displayed as expected)
Mythical Cord of Violent Decay (Non-mythical version is displayed as expected)
Mythical Pack of Treacherous Means (ditto above)
Mythical Storm Shepherd (ditto)
Mythical Murmur’s Kiss (ditto)
Mythical Sash of the Bloodlord (ditto)

Interestingly, searching for the full “conversion string” (e.g. “Vitality Damage converted to Physical Damage” or “Aether Damage converted to Lightning Damage”) will return the respective belts as expected.

Edit: I can confirm it’s not just belts. There are several items with normal/empowered/mythical versions that seem to only return one version when searching for “converted”.

[Dammitt]

Doing a normal search for “converted” leaves out several belts (maybe more, but the belts are what I noticed it for). Specifically:

Boneweave Girdle (Mythical version is displayed as expected)
Gladiator’s Distinction (Mythical version is displayed as expected)
Mythical Cord of Violent Decay (Non-mythical version is displayed as expected)
Mythical Pack of Treacherous Means (ditto above)
Mythical Storm Shepherd (ditto)
Mythical Murmur’s Kiss (ditto)
Mythical Sash of the Bloodlord (ditto)

Interestingly, searching for the full “conversion string” (e.g. “Vitality Damage converted to Physical Damage” or “Aether Damage converted to Lightning Damage”) will return the respective belts as expected.

I’ll quote myself from 2 days ago:

Not really a bug per se. but rather unusual filter order + search result count limit. It just doesn’t get included in the resulting set, due to 500 item limitation. I’m not sure though, why exactly this particular item is excluded and others are shown instead.

You can check that it’s possible to actually find this specific item, e.g. via “pierce resistance” “augment”.

On a side note if you use advanced searchm you’ll find it without any issue.

[extranji]

Ah, didn’t know about the 500 limit. Sorry to make you repeat yourself!

[Cavar]

Advanced search

How does this work exactly?

When I specify Weapon Damage = Lightning Damage and don’t enter a min/max value, I get results of items without Lightning Damage as the base damage type.

However, if I enter a min of 1 and a max of 500, for example, I get back items with base Lightning Damage.

The, if I add in an Offense filter of “[X] Lightning Damage” and NO min/max values, it doesn’t filter return what I expect it to. Adding in a min/max returns no results.

If you like I can provide a step-by-step repro. Maybe I’m just using it incorrectly.

[Dammitt]

How does this work exactly?

When I specify Weapon Damage = Lightning Damage and don’t enter a min/max value, I get results of items without Lightning Damage as the base damage type.

However, if I enter a min of 1 and a max of 500, for example, I get back items with base Lightning Damage.

The, if I add in an Offense filter of “[X] Lightning Damage” and NO min/max values, it doesn’t filter return what I expect it to. Adding in a min/max returns no results.

If you like I can provide a step-by-step repro. Maybe I’m just using it incorrectly.

You specify a filter, e.g. weapon damage = lightning famage in your case, and at least min/max value or both, there’s no trickery there, it’s supposed to be obvious, but perhaps not so much.
All filters are combined via AND, so the search returns items that match all selected filters.

[Cavar]

You specify a filter, e.g. weapon damage = lightning famage in your case, and at least min/max value or both, there’s no trickery there, it’s supposed to be obvious, but perhaps not so much.
All filters are combined via AND, so the search returns items that match all selected filters.

I would have thought that leaving the min/max blank, it would search across all ranges.

Anyway, I’ll DM you an example tomorrow of why I was confused about the results.

[USER_NAME_01]

I have a super important request that might change the general life purpose of every creature in the world.

Make the keyboard button “enter” trigger “search” button in advanced search.

[Boromonokli]

I just found advanced search a few days ago. The days of needing intricate regex incantations for simple things are now a thing of the past…

or not.

But at least it lets me search faster and apparently skip the database building step.