Stop with the constant nerfs

Well, it looked like a ban he was willingly asking for, considering his sour and overdramatic post about being done with the game.

For example to close all the Forum! :slight_smile:

P.S: Itā€™s a joke and nothing else.

Wasnā€™t banned for that.

This! As someone who play the endgame. And endgame builds. I feel this too.

Yeah i use the guides to see fast what are good items to use as extra for a set and learn stuff.
I thx for the guides and work.
But i dont care about the min max stuff. And dont care about the nerf.

Imo all this whining is what is it is. Pur whining. Like a child who start crying if something happen that it dont like. And imo a lot of stuff here is made up. ā€œWhole teams quitting the gameā€? Lol? Whole teams? Cause there faceroll build got a 10%dmg nerf or something?
And the ā€œbuild is nerfed. Unplayableā€ is also made up. Imo.

6 Likes

Oh, well. My point stands still: if youā€™re not enjoying something you dedicate a lot of time to anymore you should just leave it.

I know. :grin:

My point about mods and/or backpatching is highly relevant too. If you dislike balance in the latest patch you simply donā€™t have to play it. Demanding to reinstate unreasonably OP builds into the game does not make sense at all when you can still play them in their OP state if you so desire.

My main beef is mob powercreep two latest patches.

OP builds should be nerfed, no doubt, but monster strength increased amazingly recently. Should be toned down, really.

1 Like

Can you give me some examples please?

I searched for Fabius in Campaign, didnĀ“t see much difference, but he is a bad example because of my build. Valdaran is indeed no pushover anymore (SR) and Zantarin I didnĀ“t see any difference.

Father Kymon can oneshot you with his jump.
Queen triggering her aura every 1-2 seconds.
Grava and his enormous Fumble.
Fabius and his 600 DA shred. Combine with Kymon for leisure.
Maiden and her 500 Armor shred. With recent nerfs combine her with Fabius and/or Kymon too.

2 Likes

I thought, only ā€œoldā€ enemies were buffed? :astonished:

Well my main gripe about such topic like this is where the actual statistics are drawn from? I know and understand that for the sake of an Argument, people enjoy to generalize based on themself and their surroundings and infact, i do it myself as well. Sometimes it ā€œcanā€ be an good indicator for an different perspective in terms of an discussion, sure, but itā€™s not neccessary representative as a whole. Thatā€™s why iā€™m surprised to read some folks with their ā€œArgumentsā€ about ā€œmajority people love stuff being opā€¦ so donā€™t nerf otherwise you drive the people awayā€, and than geniunly believe that this represents the actual majority of the (core) playerbase, while they donā€™t have any actually ā€œrealā€ statistics but moreover make an assumption based on their own experience.

If we go Factual about this whole Topic, if you looked Reddit, Discord, Steam-Forum and other Social Networks, than Iā€™d say from what iā€™ve seen so far and gathered, that this whole #deadbuilds and ā€œnerf criticismā€ might be vocal, but from a minority. So atleast from that aspect / viewpoint / standpoint, there are People which complain loud about it, but compared with the population of said social networks itā€™s pretty minority which are geniunly bothered about this whole balancing situations. Most of them either donā€™t care, or are happy with it. Than again(and itā€™s pointed out many times again) the population from said Social Networks are compared to how many sold copies rather a minority already, so itā€™s hard to generalize that argument either. So the only thing which is left for us ā€œUserā€ is to argue with our own opinions and viewpoint, and maybe base about some stuff with our experience of our surroundings.

For actual real statistics, iā€™d say the only party which might know more than we doā€¦ is (yes you guessed it) the developersā€¦

So from my perspective this whole ā€œBut iā€™ve 30-40 of people in our secret discordā€ doesnā€™t do any justice, because 30-40 people compared to the sheer amount of people who own the game is like absolute nothing. And iā€™d argue in such things like closed / private Discords majority (and yeah itā€™s pretty bold to try to draw an factual statement hereā€¦ but iā€™d say atleast this is one of the arguments which might be more true if you look at history) of people look out for communitys which share an similiar mentality. So it doesnā€™t surprise me if there is a group of players which have together an discord where they are unhappy about nerfing and stuff.

/Edit:
About this whole argument of ā€œop games without balancing are successfull for offer being opā€ is like to draw a strawman here, because againā€¦ there isnā€™t an factual statistics about what many of people loved about these games, and what they might not like. The majority of people who love BG, love it for what it was overall, but in all honesty hate the OP stuff, or didnā€™t even encounter it, etc. We wanā€™t know for sure, because there will never be an poll with all votes of everyone who ever played BGā€¦ so to draw statistics is pretty impossible.

Than again from my viewpoint out, as someone which prefer most games to be ā€œbalancedā€ as possible, iā€™d argue that an cRPG is an different stance than a ARPG anywayā€¦ because iā€™d argue the core appeal of an cRPG is itā€™s narrative and campaign. For an ARPG balancing around classes, builds and such is more vital due in ARPGs you will spent most of your time building different kinds of builds, while you might go few playthrough(if even) for itā€™s narrative / dialoges etc etc.

4 Likes

I think the damage was adjusted across the board. Nevertheless, itā€™s pretty noticable, how much harder SR and Crucible becameā€¦

So nerfing OP builds is fine, buf if you also start buffing mobs like that, no wonder the game becomes a bitā€¦ twisted.

2 Likes

Since you mentioned whiningā€¦
37tl6c
Sorry for the stupid old ass meme, I couldnā€™t resist :stuck_out_tongue:

Well Iā€™m a bit torn on the matter.
On the one hand I donā€™t care much about nerfs. In 3 years of playing GD I had one (1) dead build (due to massive changes when AoM dropped).
I usually stay away from forum builds, especially the ones with crazy numbers and letters in the headline. Making my own pretty decent builds and seeing them buffed later on is a much more enjoyable experience for me :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

On the other hand, I can understand the hardcore fans who feel emotional when their favorite thing is getting attacked (not saying a nerf is an attack, but it seems like some people feel that way). But those passionate people are also the lifeforce behind a game like GD. Imagine if no one would post and discuss all those crazy builds, the game would be dead already.

All I can say to those people is please donā€™t take it too seriously. Even if itā€™s your favorite game ever, itā€™s still just a game.

1 Like

Careful, only my experience. :wink:
I havenĀ“t seen much difference in playing SR 70/71. I had no MQ so far, otherwise it was pretty ā€œnormalā€, just a bit more difficult due to nerfs to Bleeding.

Well, when Grimtools is up again, perhaps damage could be compared. There is the offline-Version (1.1.3.1 iirc) and then 1.1.4.1 online.

While I have seen a difficulty spike in the Crucible, SR was more or less the same for me. The only real ā€œproblemā€ I had was from Fabius who atleast for me, felt a bit overtuned.

But then again, I havenā€™t went up against him on 1.1.4.1 and with the spellscorched platings giving Pierce res now, and my builds having a healthy amount of pierce overcap as a result, I donā€™t think Fabius would be a problem atm. (They were capped at 80% before, so that could have been why I was having trouble)

Making builds and posting them and being min maxed is actually very different. The thing I love the most is creating new builds. Not that much really playing them, but just trying to go in the uncharted territories.

So do I enjoy playing really strong builds? Yes I do. But not playing overpowered builds. When Warlord was ridiculously overpowered was not playing them and was one of the players wanting to nerf them. After that I posted two Warlord builds.

So if something deserves Nerf, nerf it. If something is weak, buff it. But if I felt change was undeserved, I will say my opinion. Is this gonna be whining? I hope not and certainly if someone tells me that, I can say he is overreacting.

8 Likes

Giving feedback is always good. Complaining about Crucible times, menacing to quit or implying the community is deadening because of nerfs doesnā€™t help much imo.

4 Likes

Oh wow would you please share (in private of course) those secret OP builds that iā€™m sure no one ever even thought about ever anywhere ever so i could play me some really OP builds that the evil devs canā€™t nerf cuz they donā€™t know them pretty please?!!4

PM ME!!4

1 Like

How do you know about a build if it is secret? :thinking: