This game has 0 balance. OMG is it unbalanced!

this was a long time ago, mind me.

1 Like

I am quite shocked to be treated like shit although I was trying to be honest and I am a passionated guy with things I love. Grim Dawn is an amazing game. Although the graphics are dated and the balance is a joke, the atmosphere, the story, the campaign, the gameplay, they are all excellent.

Honestly, my comments can be figured by a player that played like 2-3 very different builds. He will crush the content with Soldier (no matter which skill, it’s too easy to build a soldier and be efficient) and have massive trouble with a 2H ranged commando (even Soldier can’t help here) and will only notice far too late, that to play ranged you HAVE to play the inquistor else you are at risk of having an horrible build inefficient for end game, let alone for ultimate(!).

The Krieg Set for example can be farmed AND used to be high tier. Tons of low/shit tier set were much harder to get and didn’t reward you enough.

The game is good but the learning curve is phenomenal: either you start up with a guide / watch some yt beginner builds or risk failings and dying constantly on elite.

There are too many things to learn to start to make your own builds. But when you start to know even a small bit about the game is where the balance becomes a problem. To make it simple GD heavily favors melee tanky builds, might change in the future.

1 Like

13k hours? What the actual hell. :stuck_out_tongue:

1 Like

This becomes really funny given that a lot of players are actually now claiming otherwise, how melee tank builds are actually bad. We even had a thread on how shields are actually terrible and pointless.

And no, it doesn’t. Mobile casters of various flavors exist and are very strong, a lot of them far surprassing any melee build. There are even various variants of AAR, with aether, lightning and fire being very strong.

2 Likes

You’re talking out of your ass and people are responding accordingly. Want to be taken seriously? Back your whines with some real proof of overperforming or underperforming builds, otherwise your only friend will be the secret op builds guy.

2 Likes

heh, I had the same issue, except by the (play)time my melee got geared up in Kriegs, I already had a fucking skeleton defiler knocking on korvaak’s door and finishing pretty much all content worth doing.

Please do show me this. Because what i’m getting from people, even fully geared Warlord aren’t all that great anymore.

Dark One variants because the set is a target farm like Krieg. RE/Pox Cabalist, RE/Wendigo Ritualist and Wendigo/Pox Conjurer.

Vanquisher templar because it’s also a somewhat target-farm.

Answer to all of your questions is yes. And all of the yeses can be attribute to Dark One set for example. Ritualist, Cabalist, Conjurer, take a pick. And yes they can beat Crucible naked and yes they are ahead of Krieg DK in both offense and defense. So your arguments failed yet again. Please make valuable feedback after you collect enough information!

1 Like

Vitality casters can literally play in faction gear and do a lot because the sustain is huge. They are some of the least dependant builds in the game.

Any caster that can leave his source of damage running while he constantly moves out of danger is quite good even without full sets.

I have completed Crucible 170 with both Cabalist and Oppressor with Dark One+faction gear or crafted yellow boots. But the reason is sustain and the fact you can avoid a lot of damage with positioning since you’re not melee and don’t have to facetank everything.

It’s the title for the thread you went with. You 100% click-baited that shit. You made the bed, you get to lay in it. :man_shrugging:

The moment I read the title I knew exactly what its fate would be.

1 Like

Yep, that’s exactly what happens when one passion meets a different one. It’s like a clash of two opposing religions. Most wars and deaths throughout human history are related to that.

Not really… he came in swinging fists in the title. It doesn’t matter what he says after that point or how he says it. He put a nice target on his back and then is going to act surprised when people take aim?

Hmm.

tenor%20(2)

4 Likes

It doesn’t have anything to do with different passions. He came in with a clickbait title for his thread and very flawed arguments on his original post. Of course people are gonna counter argue them.

1 Like

Flawed arguments, yet a couple people agreed? It doesn’t even take that long/ a skilled pilot to figure out the game has big balance problems. But I guess with so many variables, it’s very hard to balance an arpg.

Look, Starcraft 2, released 9 years ago and backed by a Titan (Blizzard), one of the most competitive vg, isn’t even balanced although it only has a dozen units and abilities per races. It’s not 50% according to aligulac. So a SP game…

I just wish, like many others, that build could feel as powerful as others, and 2H Ranged don’t give the same power as 2H Melee (Soldier+ anything). Sorry if you can’t admit that it’s pointless to talk.

1 Like

The people that agreed with you… not one person here is surprised at the ones that did :wink:

Now that is something I think most of us can all agree with… I’m sure Zantai
(and the rest of Crate, would also wholeheartedly agree with the sentiment too).

2 Likes

Some? Only one person actually agreed with you and another one only agreed with one part of your argument.

And if we are going by this logic, your arguments are still very flawed because a lot of people agreed they are as such. But let’s not use this logic because it’s a very bad one.

The amount of people agreeing to something doesn’t matter, the content of the argument itself is what matters.

Yet, there are two 2H Ranged builds going around that far suprass most Soldier builds. I’m not saying 2H ranged is great at the moment because it isn’t, but things are being made for things to improve.

And if you are using the “people aren’t posting it therefore it doesn’t exist” metric, that’s not a metric for anything. People posting or not posting a build shouldn’t matter about their viability.

Since when the level of agreement is an indicator of a good argument? :thinking: