At least halving ugdenbloom costs of AoM components. And/or making the alternatives such as rare boot/glove components a viable choice in terms of resists…
That’s the change that would guarantee I’d play GD from time to time for years. The dedicated hour-or-so per character of picking flowers on a forest stroll is getting very very old.
Very much so. I’d be happy to see Ugdenbloom costs (or their drop rates) get adjusted.
my point (of view) with that was that it feels wierd and that you probably have to take the vast majority of points into the one Class it Supports leaving your 2nd Class Choice in somewhat of an attribute/base stat booster niche like this in case of Markovian https://www.grimtools.com/calc/YZe66EdN.
(some may argue about the point distribution but whats the point of a single class set that also grants +2 to every Skill in that Class with a lot less Point Distribution into it then? isn’t that essentially wasted Strength? 
)
Warborn could recieve RF bonus too although idk if the Set isn’t a bit too Overstatted then given that it Supports Cadence/EoR just fine already. (for those that want to play these Skills)
Bug reports in the Bug Report section please, not here.
Crucible stuff:
can this be avoided tho? Because he is playing a Glass Cannon with like a metric ton of RR and tonns of damage (including bonus racial to humans) and a minor Crucible boss takes 2 minutes 14 seconds.
I know it’s a very rare occurence, but still, it would ruin experience for anyone.
And this, is this possible?
By the way, apart from insane power creep I like this patch, great job.
The build was created a certain way, and it’s running into expected (albeit rare) hurdles.
No, this is not possible with the way the event is coded. It checks for All mobs being dead.
Power creep was expected with this update. Perhaps now it makes sense to people why we had certain goals for clear times…
It’s actually the contrary, you were nerfing so much in the previous patches and 1.1.5.0 seems to have like so many 5 minute specs.
Actual idea within the hotfix scope:
Give Sister’s Amulet of Lifegiving some extra Oomph so we have something for everyone to fill the gaps before the L94 stuff takes over. Maybe 37% all damage, or an extra resist?
There’s Sahdina’s Memento at 84 which has 25% to every resistance 
have you looked carefullly again into all the special green items dropped at Lower Crossing?.. They need some love too!! Rookies could use some item power boost so they wont complain about veteran and frieking even normal being hard!!! 
I strongly support this suggestion. Watching the bottle travel through the air in slow mo is the worst part of BWC, and personally I think to the detriment of gameplay. I think its quite a bit slower than a IRL field test (someone should test this!). Since there are no gravity warping effects associated with the skill, I don’t think the slow animation has any in-game justification 
Some more:
good point. I forgot about that one!
“Likely”? Sister C. has 56% base ele res and 18% ele from her passive totaling at 74%. My rr on that build is 30+35+23+32=120% cold rr (plus 20% reduced on top of that). She would need at least 150% elemental/cold res on her gear to achieve the resistance observed in that video. I’m not sure if “likely” is the right word…
(Sidenote, that 23% is from Rumor nerfed long ago iirc, time to un-nerf/buff it, cold isn’t that strong anymore)
“Mono-dmg build”? This is a bad thing now? Are we heading towards Diablo or whatever it was where you had to make a backup dmg types for 100% resistant enemies?
“Expected hurdles”? Clear times being at times - literally - 200 times slower than usual is expected?
beats being stuck with durr-immunes and needing a backup damage type. btw, you only need 2 monoresist affixes of the same type (ex: sheltering for cold) to completely shit on @ya1
I don’t know if this was mentioned before (if so then this not a bad thing to repeat) but change prock on scales to something more viable.
Nowadays there is literally zero reason to pick scales over revenant.
RR that inflict only one target, with lower than 100% chance to self hit - this is clearly not that player want
I would like to get AA fixed to be not blurry with Deferred Rendering on.
I don’t know if it is possible to fix the used FXAA method or if you need to implement another AA method.
Because of the fact that with FXAA on everything gets blurry, I play with DR on and AA off (like the most of us I think).
I really really like Deferred Rendering for performance, particles and reflections, but the little edges (with AA off) annoy me.
If you could fix this issue I would be very happy and I think many others too.
Thank you in advance!